0.07/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.12/0.15	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
0.14/0.36	% Computer   : n015.cluster.edu
0.14/0.36	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.36	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.36	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.14/0.36	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.14/0.36	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.14/0.36	% WCLimit    : 120
0.14/0.36	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 12:33:49 EDT 2021
0.14/0.37	% CPUTime    : 
0.14/0.37	% Number of cores: 8
0.14/0.37	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.14/0.37	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
0.14/0.38	# No SInE strategy applied
0.14/0.38	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
59.20/59.40	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
59.20/59.40	# and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
59.20/59.40	#
59.20/59.40	# Preprocessing time       : 0.069 s
59.25/59.50	# No success with AutoSched0
59.25/59.50	# Trying AutoSched1 for 26 seconds
59.43/59.66	# AutoSched1-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
59.43/59.66	# and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
59.43/59.66	#
59.43/59.66	# Preprocessing time       : 0.065 s
59.43/59.66	
59.43/59.66	# Proof found!
59.43/59.66	# SZS status Theorem
59.43/59.66	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
59.43/59.66	thf(def_d_not, axiom, (d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:(X36=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_d_not)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_imp, axiom, (imp)=(^[X34:$o, X35:$o]:(X34=>X35)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_imp)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_l_ec, axiom, (l_ec)=(^[X38:$o, X39:$o]:(X38=>(X39=>~$true))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_ec)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_all_of, axiom, (all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:![X4:$i]:(X3 @ X4=>X2 @ X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_all_of)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_is_of, axiom, (is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:X2 @ X1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_is_of)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_non, axiom, (non)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(X2 @ X4=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_non)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_d_and, axiom, (d_and)=(^[X40:$o, X41:$o]:((X40=>(X41=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_d_and)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_l_some, axiom, (l_some)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(![X400:$i]:(in @ X400 @ X1=>(X2 @ X400=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_some)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_n_is, axiom, (n_is)=(^[X476:$i, X477:$i]:(X476)=(X477)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_n_is)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_e_is, axiom, (e_is)=(^[X1:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i]:(X60)=(X61)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_e_is)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_l_or, axiom, (l_or)=(^[X42:$o, X395:$o]:((X42=>~$true)=>X395)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_or)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_and3, axiom, (and3)=(^[X51:$o, X52:$o, X53:$o]:((X51=>(((X52=>(X53=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_and3)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_n_some, axiom, (n_some)=(^[X478:$i > $o]:(![X479:$i]:(in @ X479 @ nat=>(X478 @ X479=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_n_some)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_diffprop, axiom, (diffprop)=(^[X1:$i, X183:$i, X4:$i]:(X1)=(n_pl @ X183 @ X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_diffprop)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_or3, axiom, (or3)=(^[X48:$o, X49:$o, X50:$o]:((X48=>~$true)=>((X49=>~$true)=>X50))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_or3)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_ec3, axiom, (ec3)=(^[X54:$o, X55:$o, X56:$o]:(((X54=>(X55=>~$true))=>((((X55=>(X56=>~$true))=>((X56=>(X54=>~$true))=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_ec3)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_iii, axiom, (iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:(![X503:$i]:(in @ X503 @ nat=>((X185)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X503)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_iii)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_orec3, axiom, (orec3)=(^[X57:$o, X58:$o, X59:$o]:((((X57=>~$true)=>((X58=>~$true)=>X59))=>((((X57=>(X58=>~$true))=>((((X58=>(X59=>~$true))=>((X59=>(X57=>~$true))=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_orec3)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_d_29_ii, axiom, (d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:(![X500:$i]:(in @ X500 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X184 @ X500)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_d_29_ii)).
59.43/59.66	thf(def_lessis, axiom, (lessis)=(^[X1:$i, X188:$i]:(((![X508:$i]:(in @ X508 @ nat=>((X188)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X508)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X188))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_lessis)).
59.43/59.66	thf(satz10, axiom, all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:in @ X1 @ nat) @ (^[X1:$i]:all_of @ (^[X220:$i]:in @ X220 @ nat) @ (^[X221:$i]:orec3 @ (n_is @ X1 @ X221) @ (d_29_ii @ X1 @ X221) @ (iii @ X1 @ X221))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', satz10)).
59.43/59.66	thf(satz10k, conjecture, all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:in @ X1 @ nat) @ (^[X1:$i]:all_of @ (^[X245:$i]:in @ X245 @ nat) @ (^[X246:$i]:(d_29_ii @ X1 @ X246<=d_not @ (lessis @ X1 @ X246)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', satz10k)).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_22, axiom, (d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:(X36=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_not, def_imp])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_23, axiom, (l_ec)=(^[X38:$o, X39:$o]:(X38=>(X39=>~$true))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_ec, def_imp]), c_0_22])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_24, axiom, (all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:![X4:$i]:(X3 @ X4=>X2 @ X4)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_all_of, def_is_of])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_25, axiom, (non)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(X2 @ X4=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_non, c_0_22])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_26, axiom, (d_and)=(^[X40:$o, X41:$o]:((X40=>(X41=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_and, c_0_22]), c_0_23])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_27, axiom, (l_some)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(![X400:$i]:(in @ X400 @ X1=>(X2 @ X400=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_some, c_0_24]), c_0_22]), c_0_25])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_28, axiom, (n_is)=(^[X476:$i, X477:$i]:(X476)=(X477)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is, def_e_is])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_29, axiom, (l_or)=(^[X42:$o, X395:$o]:((X42=>~$true)=>X395)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_or, def_imp]), c_0_22])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_30, axiom, (and3)=(^[X51:$o, X52:$o, X53:$o]:((X51=>(((X52=>(X53=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_and3, c_0_26])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_31, axiom, (n_some)=(^[X478:$i > $o]:(![X479:$i]:(in @ X479 @ nat=>(X478 @ X479=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_some, c_0_27])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_32, axiom, (diffprop)=(^[X1:$i, X183:$i, X4:$i]:(X1)=(n_pl @ X183 @ X4)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_diffprop, c_0_28])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_33, axiom, (or3)=(^[X48:$o, X49:$o, X50:$o]:((X48=>~$true)=>((X49=>~$true)=>X50))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_or3, c_0_29])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_34, axiom, (ec3)=(^[X54:$o, X55:$o, X56:$o]:(((X54=>(X55=>~$true))=>((((X55=>(X56=>~$true))=>((X56=>(X54=>~$true))=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_ec3, c_0_23]), c_0_30])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_35, axiom, (iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:(![X503:$i]:(in @ X503 @ nat=>((X185)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X503)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_iii, c_0_31]), c_0_32])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_36, axiom, (orec3)=(^[X57:$o, X58:$o, X59:$o]:((((X57=>~$true)=>((X58=>~$true)=>X59))=>((((X57=>(X58=>~$true))=>((((X58=>(X59=>~$true))=>((X59=>(X57=>~$true))=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_orec3, c_0_26]), c_0_33]), c_0_34])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_37, axiom, (d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:(![X500:$i]:(in @ X500 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X184 @ X500)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii, c_0_31]), c_0_32])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X974:$i, X984:$i]:(epred20_2 @ X984 @ X974<=>~((((X974)!=(X984)=>(![X985:$i]:(in @ X985 @ nat=>(X974)!=(n_pl @ X984 @ X985))=>~(![X986:$i]:(in @ X986 @ nat=>(X984)!=(n_pl @ X974 @ X986)))))=>(((X974)=(X984)=>![X987:$i]:(in @ X987 @ nat=>(X974)!=(n_pl @ X984 @ X987)))=>((~(![X988:$i]:(in @ X988 @ nat=>(X974)!=(n_pl @ X984 @ X988)))=>![X989:$i]:(in @ X989 @ nat=>(X984)!=(n_pl @ X974 @ X989)))=>~((~(![X990:$i]:(in @ X990 @ nat=>(X984)!=(n_pl @ X974 @ X990)))=>(X974)!=(X984)))))))), introduced(definition)).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_39, axiom, (lessis)=(^[X1:$i, X188:$i]:(((![X508:$i]:(in @ X508 @ nat=>((X188)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X508)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X188))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_lessis, c_0_29]), c_0_28]), c_0_35])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_40, plain, ![X974:$i]:(in @ X974 @ nat=>![X984:$i]:(in @ X984 @ nat=>epred20_2 @ X984 @ X974)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[satz10, c_0_24]), c_0_36]), c_0_28]), c_0_37]), c_0_35])]), c_0_38])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1195:$i]:(in @ X1195 @ nat=>![X1201:$i]:(in @ X1201 @ nat=>(~((![X1203:$i]:(in @ X1203 @ nat=>(X1201)!=(n_pl @ X1195 @ X1203))=>(X1195)=(X1201)))=>~(![X1202:$i]:(in @ X1202 @ nat=>(X1195)!=(n_pl @ X1201 @ X1202))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz10k]), c_0_24]), c_0_22]), c_0_37]), c_0_39])])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_42, plain, ![X1674:$i, X1675:$i]:(~in @ X1674 @ nat|(~in @ X1675 @ nat|epred20_2 @ X1675 @ X1674)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_40])])])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ![X1716:$i, X1717:$i]:(in @ esk58_0 @ nat&(in @ esk59_0 @ nat&(((~in @ X1716 @ nat|(esk59_0)!=(n_pl @ esk58_0 @ X1716))&(esk58_0)!=(esk59_0))&(~in @ X1717 @ nat|(esk58_0)!=(n_pl @ esk59_0 @ X1717))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_41])])])])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_44, plain, ![X974:$i, X984:$i]:(epred20_2 @ X984 @ X974=>~((((X974)!=(X984)=>(![X985:$i]:(in @ X985 @ nat=>(X974)!=(n_pl @ X984 @ X985))=>~(![X986:$i]:(in @ X986 @ nat=>(X984)!=(n_pl @ X974 @ X986)))))=>(((X974)=(X984)=>![X987:$i]:(in @ X987 @ nat=>(X974)!=(n_pl @ X984 @ X987)))=>((~(![X988:$i]:(in @ X988 @ nat=>(X974)!=(n_pl @ X984 @ X988)))=>![X989:$i]:(in @ X989 @ nat=>(X984)!=(n_pl @ X974 @ X989)))=>~((~(![X990:$i]:(in @ X990 @ nat=>(X984)!=(n_pl @ X974 @ X990)))=>(X974)!=(X984)))))))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_45, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:(epred20_2 @ X4 @ X1|~in @ X1 @ nat|~in @ X4 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, in @ esk59_0 @ nat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_47, plain, ![X1864:$i, X1865:$i, X1868:$i, X1869:$i, X1870:$i, X1871:$i]:((((in @ (esk74_2 @ X1864 @ X1865) @ nat|in @ (esk73_2 @ X1864 @ X1865) @ nat|(X1864)=(X1865)|~epred20_2 @ X1865 @ X1864)&((X1865)=(n_pl @ X1864 @ (esk74_2 @ X1864 @ X1865))|in @ (esk73_2 @ X1864 @ X1865) @ nat|(X1864)=(X1865)|~epred20_2 @ X1865 @ X1864))&((in @ (esk74_2 @ X1864 @ X1865) @ nat|(X1864)=(n_pl @ X1865 @ (esk73_2 @ X1864 @ X1865))|(X1864)=(X1865)|~epred20_2 @ X1865 @ X1864)&((X1865)=(n_pl @ X1864 @ (esk74_2 @ X1864 @ X1865))|(X1864)=(n_pl @ X1865 @ (esk73_2 @ X1864 @ X1865))|(X1864)=(X1865)|~epred20_2 @ X1865 @ X1864)))&(((X1864)!=(X1865)|(~in @ X1868 @ nat|(X1864)!=(n_pl @ X1865 @ X1868))|~epred20_2 @ X1865 @ X1864)&((~in @ X1869 @ nat|(X1864)!=(n_pl @ X1865 @ X1869)|(~in @ X1870 @ nat|(X1865)!=(n_pl @ X1864 @ X1870))|~epred20_2 @ X1865 @ X1864)&(~in @ X1871 @ nat|(X1865)!=(n_pl @ X1864 @ X1871)|(X1864)!=(X1865)|~epred20_2 @ X1865 @ X1864)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_44])])])])])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(epred20_2 @ esk59_0 @ X1|~in @ X1 @ nat), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45, c_0_46])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_49, negated_conjecture, in @ esk58_0 @ nat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_50, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:((X1)=(n_pl @ X4 @ (esk74_2 @ X4 @ X1))|(X4)=(n_pl @ X1 @ (esk73_2 @ X4 @ X1))|(X4)=(X1)|~epred20_2 @ X1 @ X4), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_51, negated_conjecture, epred20_2 @ esk59_0 @ esk58_0, inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48, c_0_49])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_52, negated_conjecture, (esk58_0)!=(esk59_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_53, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~in @ X1 @ nat|(esk58_0)!=(n_pl @ esk59_0 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_54, plain, ((n_pl @ esk59_0 @ (esk73_2 @ esk58_0 @ esk59_0))=(esk58_0)|(n_pl @ esk58_0 @ (esk74_2 @ esk58_0 @ esk59_0))=(esk59_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50, c_0_51]), c_0_52])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_55, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:((X1)=(n_pl @ X4 @ (esk74_2 @ X4 @ X1))|in @ (esk73_2 @ X4 @ X1) @ nat|(X4)=(X1)|~epred20_2 @ X1 @ X4), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_56, negated_conjecture, ((n_pl @ esk58_0 @ (esk74_2 @ esk58_0 @ esk59_0))=(esk59_0)|~in @ (esk73_2 @ esk58_0 @ esk59_0) @ nat), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53, c_0_54])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_57, plain, ![X4:$i, X1:$i]:(in @ (esk74_2 @ X1 @ X4) @ nat|(X1)=(n_pl @ X4 @ (esk73_2 @ X1 @ X4))|(X1)=(X4)|~epred20_2 @ X4 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_58, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~in @ X1 @ nat|(esk59_0)!=(n_pl @ esk58_0 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_59, plain, (n_pl @ esk58_0 @ (esk74_2 @ esk58_0 @ esk59_0))=(esk59_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55, c_0_51]), c_0_52]), c_0_56])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_60, plain, ((n_pl @ esk59_0 @ (esk73_2 @ esk58_0 @ esk59_0))=(esk58_0)|in @ (esk74_2 @ esk58_0 @ esk59_0) @ nat), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57, c_0_51]), c_0_52])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_61, negated_conjecture, ~in @ (esk74_2 @ esk58_0 @ esk59_0) @ nat, inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58, c_0_59])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_62, plain, (n_pl @ esk59_0 @ (esk73_2 @ esk58_0 @ esk59_0))=(esk58_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_60, c_0_61])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_63, plain, ![X4:$i, X1:$i]:(in @ (esk74_2 @ X1 @ X4) @ nat|in @ (esk73_2 @ X1 @ X4) @ nat|(X1)=(X4)|~epred20_2 @ X4 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_64, negated_conjecture, ~in @ (esk73_2 @ esk58_0 @ esk59_0) @ nat, inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53, c_0_62])).
59.43/59.66	thf(c_0_65, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63, c_0_51]), c_0_52]), c_0_61]), c_0_64]), ['proof']).
59.43/59.66	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
59.43/59.66	# Proof object total steps             : 66
59.43/59.66	# Proof object clause steps            : 20
59.43/59.66	# Proof object formula steps           : 46
59.43/59.66	# Proof object conjectures             : 13
59.43/59.66	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 10
59.43/59.66	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
59.43/59.66	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
59.43/59.66	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 22
59.43/59.66	# Proof object generating inferences   : 9
59.43/59.66	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 8
59.43/59.66	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
59.43/59.66	# Parsed axioms                        : 358
59.43/59.66	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
59.43/59.66	# Initial clauses                      : 506
59.43/59.66	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 153
59.43/59.66	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 353
59.43/59.66	# Processed clauses                    : 509
59.43/59.66	# ...of these trivial                  : 10
59.43/59.66	# ...subsumed                          : 24
59.43/59.66	# ...remaining for further processing  : 474
59.43/59.66	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 238
59.43/59.66	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
59.43/59.66	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
59.43/59.66	# Backward-rewritten                   : 6
59.43/59.66	# Generated clauses                    : 4933
59.43/59.66	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 4642
59.43/59.66	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
59.43/59.66	# Paramodulations                      : 4475
59.43/59.66	# Factorizations                       : 0
59.43/59.66	# NegExts                              : 0
59.43/59.66	# Equation resolutions                 : 240
59.43/59.66	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
59.43/59.66	#    Propositional check models        : 0
59.43/59.66	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
59.43/59.66	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
59.43/59.66	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
59.43/59.66	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
59.43/59.66	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
59.43/59.66	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
59.43/59.66	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
59.43/59.66	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
59.43/59.66	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
59.43/59.66	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
59.43/59.66	# Current number of processed clauses  : 421
59.43/59.66	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 148
59.43/59.66	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
59.43/59.66	#    Negative unit clauses             : 38
59.43/59.66	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 232
59.43/59.66	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4486
59.43/59.66	# ...number of literals in the above   : 14473
59.43/59.66	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
59.43/59.66	# Current number of archived clauses   : 7
59.43/59.66	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17400
59.43/59.66	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3554
59.43/59.66	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 21
59.43/59.66	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7233
59.43/59.66	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 2
59.43/59.66	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 21
59.43/59.66	# BW rewrite match successes           : 3
59.43/59.66	# Condensation attempts                : 0
59.43/59.66	# Condensation successes               : 0
59.43/59.66	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 133385
59.43/59.66	
59.43/59.66	# -------------------------------------------------
59.43/59.66	# User time                : 58.143 s
59.43/59.66	# System time              : 1.124 s
59.43/59.66	# Total time               : 59.267 s
59.43/59.66	# Maximum resident set size: 2188 pages
59.43/59.66	EOF